RELEASE (Source: http://loppsi2-habitat.blogspot.com/)
a time when the Government is attacked any part of its policy of repression and racism against Roma, Travellers and generally insecure populations, it passed into force Article 32 b of the A 2 LOPSSI against people of slums, housing property, such as homeless encampments in the Bois de Vincennes, and also against people who chose to live caravans, trailers, trucks, tipis, yurts, auto and eco-construction.
Any construction without building permits, as exists in many overseas territories could also fall under this special procedure, because a building without a permit was "unlawful". This procedure also threatens the squatters: the Ministry of Interior announced its intention to extend the occupants of premises in the second reading in the National Assembly.Article 32b of the LOPPSI A 2 is an exceptional measure because it violates the principles of protection by the judge's home, property, family and private life, and gives arbitrary power and disproportionate to the Prefect: indeed, the expulsion procedure currently in place on housing property, requires a judge's decision, it protects expulsion in winter, it can be taken into account in devices relocation or accommodation, must meet deadlines and procedural documents issued by a bailiff, it provides for the protection of property of those expelled ....
It is arbitrary because it is justified by "a serious risk to the safety, security, tranquility public" scalable and fuzzy notions give way to all interpretations . It applies to any person who has decided in a meeting (2 persons and more), to settle on land irrespective of the owner, and the nature of the relationship between the landowner and residents. Even if a people is the owner of the land or if land use is under contract with the occupiers, or simply if the owner is not opposed to this installation, the Prefect may use this exception process within 48h.
The article provides a financial penalty for those who do not run fast enough, and the destruction of housing and property it contains, on procedure accelerated. Destruction in bulldozers and theft of property of others and be legalized. This provision opens the way for an infringement of property rights.
This law would facilitate the destruction of authoritarian construction known as "unlawful" and the realization of the "fight anticabanisation" launched in particular by the prefect of the Pyrenees Orientales since 2007.
This provision aims and overwhelms those most severely affected by the housing crisis. In contrast to the policies of 50 years ago, it responds to the renewed slums and the most acute forms of inadequate housing by repression and expulsion proceedings expeditiously.
Indeed, while the Government claims to implement the right to housing, there is no provision for accommodation or accommodation for the evicted. They must leave and go "invisible".
- We demand the withdrawal of this product, return and compliance with the Act on the grounds of origin host, adopted in 2000 as part of the SRU law, and measures laws that recognize the quality of home and its permanence in the habitat selected, rather than repress and stigmatize.
- We demand that the policy of slum clearance and habitat falls within makeshift housing policies, the implementation of the law and procedures DALO unhealthy ... so that each and each can be accommodated with dignity,
- We denounce the repressive and stigmatizing of the Government that attacks smaller and more fragile, and demand the abandonment of any project antisquat.
to learn more about this draconian law:
http://camionning.1fr1.net/legislation-f33/alerte-loppsi -2-32-b-a-warning-our-home-in-safe-t2144.htm # 45190
0 comments:
Post a Comment